"The Philosopher's Toolkit is a very good book. It could behighly useful for both introductory courses in philosophy, orphilosophical methodology, as well as independent study for anyoneinterested in the methods of argument, assessment and criticismused in contemporary analytic philosophy. It is unique in approach, and written in a pleasant and considerate tone. Its authors areboth competent philosophers, and the book visibly reflects theirdeep sympathy to the discipline and their appreciation of itsunique character. This book will help one to get going to dophilosophy, but more advanced students might find this text helpfultoo. I wish I had had access to this book as an undergraduate.„(Teaching Philosophy)
“This book is ... an encyclopedia of philosophy. It should be ofgreat use as a quick and accurate reference guide to the skill ofphilosophy, especially for beginners, but also for instructors ... highly recommended.„ (Choice)
“Its choice of tools for basic argument ... is sound, whilefurther tools for argument ... move through topics and examplesconcisely and wittily... Sources are well chosen and indicated stepby step. Sections are cross-referenced (making it better than theTeach Youself „100 philosophical concepts“) and supported by auseful index.„ (Reference Reviews)
“... the average person who is interested in arguments and logicbut who doesn't have much background in philosophy would certainlyfind this book useful, as would anyone teaching a course onarguments, logic, and reasoning. Even introductory courses onphilosophy in general might benefit because the book lays out somany of the conceptual „tools“ which will prove necessary overstudents' careers.„ (About. com)“The Philosopher's Toolkit provides a welcome and usefuladdition to the introductory philosophy books available. It takesthe beginner through most of the core conceptual tools anddistinctions used by philosophers, explaining them simply and withabundant examples. Newcomers to philosophy will find much in herethat will help them to understand the subject."
--David S. Oderberg, University of Reading