Texture in the Work of Ian Hacking von María Laura Martínez Rodríguez | Michel Foucault as the Guiding Thread of Hacking’s Thinking | ISBN 9783030647858

Texture in the Work of Ian Hacking

Michel Foucault as the Guiding Thread of Hacking’s Thinking

von María Laura Martínez Rodríguez
Buchcover Texture in the Work of Ian Hacking | María Laura Martínez Rodríguez | EAN 9783030647858 | ISBN 3-030-64785-4 | ISBN 978-3-030-64785-8
“The current book provides a deep and thorough insight into the influence of Foucault on Hacking's thinking. … The author has nicely spelled out the structure and main content of the book in the Introduction, chapter by chapter.”  (Peeter Müürsepp, Mathematical Reviews, April, 2022)

Texture in the Work of Ian Hacking

Michel Foucault as the Guiding Thread of Hacking’s Thinking

von María Laura Martínez Rodríguez

This book offers a systematized overview of Ian Hacking's work. It presents Hacking’s oeuvre as a network made up of four interconnected key nodes: styles of scientific thinking & doing, probability, making up people, and experimentation and scientific realism.

Its central claim is that Michel Foucault’s influence is the underlying thread that runs across the Canadian philosopher’s oeuvre. Foucault’s imprint on Hacking’s work is usually mentioned in relation to styles of scientific reasoning and the human sciences. This research shows that Foucault’s influence can in fact be extended beyond these fields, insofar the underlying interest to the whole corpus of Hacking’s works, namely the analysis of conditions of possibility, is stimulated by the work of the French philosopher.

Displacing scientific realism as the central focus of Ian Hacking’s oeuvre opens up a very different landscape, showing, behind the apparent dispersion of his works, thefar-reaching interest that amalgamates them: to reveal the historical and situated conditions of possibility for the emergence of scientific objects and concepts.

This book shows how Hacking’s deployment concepts such as looping effect, making up people, and interactive kinds, can complement Foucauldian analyses, offering an overarching perspective that can provide a better explanation of the objects of the human sciences and their behaviors.