Phosphorylation profiling of systemin versus MAMP signaling reveals signaling specificity in plant immunity von Rong Li | ISBN 9783689523121

Phosphorylation profiling of systemin versus MAMP signaling reveals signaling specificity in plant immunity

von Rong Li
Buchcover Phosphorylation profiling of systemin versus MAMP signaling reveals signaling specificity in plant immunity | Rong Li | EAN 9783689523121 | ISBN 3-689-52312-5 | ISBN 978-3-689-52312-1
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Leseprobe

Phosphorylation profiling of systemin versus MAMP signaling reveals signaling specificity in plant immunity

von Rong Li
Plasma membrane-localized pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) detect both microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) such as flg22 and chitin, and host-derived signals like systemin. While early signaling events (phosphorylation, ROS burst, MAPK activation) are largely similar, they lead to different biological outcomes:
• MAMPs activate innate immunity,
• Systemin induces wound and herbivore defense responses.
To investigate how specificity arises, phospho-proteomics was applied in tomato cells (wild type vs. systemin receptor-deficient). In total, 4701 phospho-sites on 2119 proteins were identified. Using imputation and clustering, seven temporal phosphorylation patterns were observed:
• Systemin uniquely caused dephosphorylation at 1–15 min,
• flg22 triggered an early rapid phosphorylation response,
• Chitin mainly induced late phosphorylation events.
Specificity was illustrated by three protein groups:
1. RLCK/PBL kinases → different family members respond in an elicitor-specific way.
2. S-type anion channel SLAC1 → carries a single regulatory site, differentially phosphorylated depending on the elicitor.
3. Phosphatase PLL1a → has multiple elicitor-specific phospho-sites (flg22: Ser50–59, chitin: Ser86–89, systemin: Ser163–181).
Network analysis suggested that PLL1a regulates RBOHs, which was functionally validated using phospho-mimic/dead PLL1 mutants in Nicotiana.